Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

Disparities Dashboard

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

green chart bars Significantly better than the overall value

red chart bars Significantly worse than the overall value

dark blue chart bars Significantly different than the overall value

light blue chart bars No significant difference with the overall value

gray chart bars No data on significance available

More information about the gauges and icons

State: Mississippi

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi Age-Adjusted Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Death Rate

15.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 15.1 which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.6 while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.5.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (23.5), Mississippi has a value of 15.1 which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (15.1) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (13.0).
Prior Value
(13.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi

Health / Cancer

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi

Health / Cancer

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Breast Cancer

Current Value:
23.5
Deaths per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 23.5 which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.8 while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.8.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (19.6), Mississippi has a value of 23.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(19.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (23.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (22.8).
Prior Value
(22.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (15.3), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(15.3)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cancer

Current Value:
181.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 181.0 which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 150.7 while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 160.6.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (149.4), Mississippi has a value of 181.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(149.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (181.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (183.8).
Prior Value
(183.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (122.7), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(122.7)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Colorectal Cancer

Current Value:
17.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 17.6 which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.2 while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.3.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (13.1), Mississippi has a value of 17.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (17.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.7).
Prior Value
(17.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.9), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.9)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Lung Cancer

Current Value:
49.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 49.5 which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.6 while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.6.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (35.0), Mississippi has a value of 49.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(35.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (49.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (51.4).
Prior Value
(51.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.1), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.1)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Prostate Cancer

Current Value:
24.3
Deaths per 100,000 males
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 24.3 which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.4 while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.2.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (18.8), Mississippi has a value of 24.3 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(18.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (24.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (24.7).
Prior Value
(24.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (16.9), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(16.9)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi All Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:

State: Mississippi All Cancer Incidence Rate

465.4
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 465.4 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 454.3 while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 465.5.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 48 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (442.3), Mississippi has a value of 465.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(442.3)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (465.4) is less and better than the previously measured value (476.0).
Prior Value
(476.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi Breast Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Breast Cancer Incidence Rate

122.3
Cases per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 122.3 which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 129.5 while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 134.1.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 48 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (127.0), Mississippi has a value of 122.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(127.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (122.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (123.3).
Prior Value
(123.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi Cancer: Medicare Population

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Cancer: Medicare Population

11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Mississippi has a value of 11.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (11.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.0%).
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi Cervical Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Cervical Cancer Incidence Rate

8.9
Cases per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 8.9 which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.2 while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 48 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (7.5), Mississippi has a value of 8.9 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (8.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.3).
Prior Value
(9.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
46.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 46.5 which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 36.1 while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.5.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 48 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (36.5), Mississippi has a value of 46.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(36.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (46.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (48.3).
Prior Value
(48.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
69.9
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 69.9 which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 56.1 while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 61.2.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 48 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (54.0), Mississippi has a value of 69.9 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(54.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (69.9) is less and better than the previously measured value (72.8).
Prior Value
(72.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi Mammography Screening: Medicare Population

Current Value:
44.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 44.0% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than 46.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than 44.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (47.0%), Mississippi has a value of 44.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (44.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (43.0%).
Prior Value
(43.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi Oral Cavity and Pharynx Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
13.1
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 13.1 which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.3 while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.9.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 48 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (11.9), Mississippi has a value of 13.1 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (13.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.9).
Prior Value
(12.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate

131.4
Cases per 100,000 males
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 131.4 which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 114.1 while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 123.0.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 48 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (110.5), Mississippi has a value of 131.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(110.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (131.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (135.6).
Prior Value
(135.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi Diabetes: Medicare Population

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Diabetes: Medicare Population

28.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 28.0% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (24.0%), Mississippi has a value of 28.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (28.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (28.0%).
Prior Value
(28.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi

Health / Disabilities

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi

Health / Disabilities

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi Adults with an Independent Living Difficulty

Current Value:
7.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Mississippi has a value of 7.9%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (7.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.1%).
Prior Value
(8.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi Children with a Disability

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Children with a Disability

5.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (4.5%), Mississippi has a value of 5.6%.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty

Current Value:
7.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (5.3%), Mississippi has a value of 7.0%.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi Persons with a Disability

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Persons with a Disability

17.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Mississippi has a value of 17.2%.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi Persons with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:
4.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (3.6%), Mississippi has a value of 4.2%.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:
3.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (2.6%), Mississippi has a value of 3.4%.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi Persons with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:
4.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Mississippi has a value of 4.1%.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty

Current Value:
9.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (6.7%), Mississippi has a value of 9.9%.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi Adults 65+ with Medicare Insurance

Current Value:
97.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (95.6%), Mississippi has a value of 97.8%.
US Value
(95.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi Adults with Health Insurance

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Adults with Health Insurance

83.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 83.6% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.6% while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.6%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (88.7%), Mississippi has a value of 83.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(88.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (83.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (82.3%).
Prior Value
(82.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi Children with Health Insurance

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Children with Health Insurance

94.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 94.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than 95.5% while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than 94.2%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (94.9%), Mississippi has a value of 94.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(94.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (94.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (93.8%).
Prior Value
(93.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi Persons with Health Insurance

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Persons with Health Insurance

85.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 85.7% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than 88.1%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (85.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (86.1%).
Prior Value
(86.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (92.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi Persons with Private Health Insurance Only

Current Value:
49.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (54.8%), Mississippi has a value of 49.0%.
US Value
(54.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (49.0%) is greater  than the previously measured value (47.9%).
Prior Value
(47.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi Persons with Public Health Insurance Only

Current Value:
27.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (24.8%), Mississippi has a value of 27.6%.
US Value
(24.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (27.6%) is less  than the previously measured value (28.4%).
Prior Value
(28.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population

Current Value:
3,349.0
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 3,349.0 which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,617.0 while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,014.0.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (2,677.0), Mississippi has a value of 3,349.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(2,677.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (3,349.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (3,423.0).
Prior Value
(3,423.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi

Health / Health Information Technology

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi

Health / Health Information Technology

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi Persons with an Internet Subscription

Current Value:
83.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 83.9% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.8% while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than 89.6%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (91.0%), Mississippi has a value of 83.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Attack

Current Value:
135.8
Deaths per 100,000 population 35+ years
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (135.8) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (119.6).
Prior Value
(119.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population

Current Value:
14.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 14.0% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (14.0%), Mississippi has a value of 14.0%.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (14.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (13.0%).
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi Heart Failure: Medicare Population

Current Value:
11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Mississippi has a value of 11.0%.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (11.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.0%).
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population

Current Value:
65.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 65.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 64.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 67.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Mississippi has a value of 65.0%.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (65.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (64.0%).
Prior Value
(64.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi Hypertension: Medicare Population

Current Value:
74.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 74.0% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 66.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 69.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Mississippi has a value of 74.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (74.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (73.0%).
Prior Value
(73.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population

Current Value:
24.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 24.0% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (21.0%), Mississippi has a value of 24.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (24.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (24.0%).
Prior Value
(24.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi Stroke: Medicare Population

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Stroke: Medicare Population

6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 6.0% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Mississippi has a value of 6.0%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (6.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population

Current Value:
44.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 44.0% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than 49.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than 46.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (50.0%), Mississippi has a value of 44.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (44.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (42.0%).
Prior Value
(42.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population

Current Value:
7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 7.0% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than 7.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than 7.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (8.0%), Mississippi has a value of 7.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (7.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (5.0%).
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi Depression: Medicare Population

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Depression: Medicare Population

16.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 16.0% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (16.0%), Mississippi has a value of 16.0%.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (16.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.0%).
Prior Value
(16.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi

Health / Older Adults

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi

Health / Older Adults

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi Adults 65+ with a Disability

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Adults 65+ with a Disability

40.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), Mississippi has a value of 40.7%.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:
15.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Mississippi has a value of 15.2%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:
9.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (7.4%), Mississippi has a value of 9.2%.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:
8.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Mississippi has a value of 8.9%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty

Current Value:
16.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (13.6%), Mississippi has a value of 16.7%.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population

Current Value:
6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Mississippi has a value of 6.0%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (6.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi

Health / Other Conditions

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi

Health / Other Conditions

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population

Current Value:
15.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 15.0% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (18.0%), Mississippi has a value of 15.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (15.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.0%).
Prior Value
(15.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi Osteoporosis: Medicare Population

Current Value:
10.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 10.0% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Mississippi has a value of 10.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (10.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (9.0%).
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population

39.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 39.0% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 37.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (35.0%), Mississippi has a value of 39.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (39.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (38.0%).
Prior Value
(38.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi

Health / Prevention & Safety

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi

Health / Prevention & Safety

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Firearms

Current Value:
23.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 23.8 which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.8 while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.9.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (12.0), Mississippi has a value of 23.8 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (23.8) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (21.4).
Prior Value
(21.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.7), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.7)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi Asthma: Medicare Population

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Asthma: Medicare Population

5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Mississippi has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (5.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.0%).
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi COPD: Medicare Population

Current Value:

State: Mississippi COPD: Medicare Population

12.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 12.0% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Mississippi has a value of 12.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (12.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.0%).
Prior Value
(12.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Homicide

Current Value:
16.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 16.4 which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.2 while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.6.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (6.6), Mississippi has a value of 16.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (16.4) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (13.8).
Prior Value
(13.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.5), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.5)
<div>IVP-09: Reduce homicides <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi

Community / Demographics

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi

Community / Demographics

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi Foreign Born Persons

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Foreign Born Persons

2.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Mississippi has a value of 2.3%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi Veteran Population

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Veteran Population

6.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (6.6%), Mississippi has a value of 6.9%.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi

Community / Transportation

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi

Community / Transportation

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi Households without a Vehicle

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Households without a Vehicle

6.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 6.1% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.2% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (8.3%), Mississippi has a value of 6.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi Mean Travel Time to Work

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Mean Travel Time to Work

25.4
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 25.4 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.3 while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.7.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Mississippi has a value of 25.4 which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi Workers Commuting by Public Transportation

Current Value:
0.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 0.3% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than 1.1% while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.6%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), Mississippi has a value of 0.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.3%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi Workers who Drive Alone to Work

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Workers who Drive Alone to Work

83.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 83.6% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 75.2% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 78.3%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (71.7%), Mississippi has a value of 83.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(71.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi

Economy / Housing & Homes

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi

Economy / Housing & Homes

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi Overcrowded Households

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Overcrowded Households

2.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (3.3%), Mississippi has a value of 2.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.3% in 2016-2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent

50.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 50.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 47.8% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 50.4%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Mississippi has a value of 50.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi

Economy / Income

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi

Economy / Income

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi Median Household Income

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Median Household Income

$52,985
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of $52,985 which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than $72,458 while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than $66,341.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value ($75,149), Mississippi has a value of $52,985 which is lower and worse.
US Value
($75,149)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi Per Capita Income

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Per Capita Income

$29,209
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of $29,209 which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than $38,585 while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than $36,754.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value ($41,261), Mississippi has a value of $29,209 which is lower and worse.
US Value
($41,261)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi

Economy / Poverty

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi

Economy / Poverty

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi Children Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
26.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 26.8% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.6% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.9%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Mississippi has a value of 26.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi Families Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
14.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 14.4% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.6% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Mississippi has a value of 14.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
13.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 13.4% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.1% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.6%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Mississippi has a value of 13.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count)

Current Value:
63,353
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi People Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
19.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 19.2% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.9% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.6%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Mississippi has a value of 19.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi Young Children Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
29.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 29.3% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.9% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.3%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (18.1%), Mississippi has a value of 29.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(18.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi Youth not in School or Working

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Youth not in School or Working

2.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 2.1% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.8% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.1%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Mississippi has a value of 2.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi

Education / Educational Attainment

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi

Education / Educational Attainment

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher

Current Value:
23.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 23.9% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than 33.5% while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than 30.2%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (34.3%), Mississippi has a value of 23.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher

Current Value:
86.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 86.2% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.2% while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than 88.7%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (89.1%), Mississippi has a value of 86.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

State: Mississippi

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi Access to Parks

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Access to Parks

29.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (29.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (11.5%).
Prior Value
(11.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Gulf Coast Community Exchange