Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

All Data

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

State: Mississippi

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi Adults who Drink Excessively

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Adults who Drink Excessively

15.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 15.7% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.3% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.3%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (18.1%), Mississippi has a value of 15.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (15.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.4%).
Prior Value
(16.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Drug Poisoning

27.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (27.3) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (19.8).
Prior Value
(19.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Age-Adjusted Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Death Rate

15.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 15.1 which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.6 while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.5.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (23.5), Mississippi has a value of 15.1 which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (15.1) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (13.0).
Prior Value
(13.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Mississippi Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning

Current Value:
19.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 19.9 which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.9 while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.1.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (27.2), Mississippi has a value of 19.9 which is lower and better.
US Value
(27.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (20.7), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(20.7)
<div>SU-03: Reduce drug overdose deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

State: Mississippi Teens who Binge Drink

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Teens who Binge Drink

4.0%
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (4.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.9%).
Prior Value
(3.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Teens who Use Alcohol

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Teens who Use Alcohol

7.3%
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (7.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.9%).
Prior Value
(7.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Teens who Use Illicit Drugs

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Teens who Use Illicit Drugs

5.5%
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (5.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.7%).
Prior Value
(6.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Teens who Use Marijuana

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Teens who Use Marijuana

4.6%
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (4.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.1%).
Prior Value
(5.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.8%)

State: Mississippi

Health / Cancer

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi

Health / Cancer

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Breast Cancer

Current Value:
23.5
Deaths per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 23.5 which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.8 while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.8.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (19.6), Mississippi has a value of 23.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(19.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (23.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (22.8).
Prior Value
(22.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (15.3), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(15.3)

State: Mississippi Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cancer

Current Value:
181.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 181.0 which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 150.7 while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 160.6.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (149.4), Mississippi has a value of 181.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(149.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (181.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (183.8).
Prior Value
(183.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (122.7), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(122.7)

State: Mississippi Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Colorectal Cancer

Current Value:
17.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 17.6 which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.2 while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.3.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (13.1), Mississippi has a value of 17.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (17.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.7).
Prior Value
(17.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.9), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.9)

State: Mississippi Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Lung Cancer

Current Value:
49.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 49.5 which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.6 while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.6.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (35.0), Mississippi has a value of 49.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(35.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (49.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (51.4).
Prior Value
(51.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.1), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.1)

State: Mississippi Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Prostate Cancer

Current Value:
24.3
Deaths per 100,000 males
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 24.3 which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.4 while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.2.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (18.8), Mississippi has a value of 24.3 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(18.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (24.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (24.7).
Prior Value
(24.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (16.9), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(16.9)

State: Mississippi All Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:

State: Mississippi All Cancer Incidence Rate

465.4
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 465.4 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 454.3 while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 465.5.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 48 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (442.3), Mississippi has a value of 465.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(442.3)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (465.4) is less and better than the previously measured value (476.0).
Prior Value
(476.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Breast Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Breast Cancer Incidence Rate

122.3
Cases per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 122.3 which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 129.5 while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 134.1.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 48 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (127.0), Mississippi has a value of 122.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(127.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (122.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (123.3).
Prior Value
(123.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Cancer: Medicare Population

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Cancer: Medicare Population

11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Mississippi has a value of 11.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (11.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.0%).
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Cervical Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Cervical Cancer Incidence Rate

8.9
Cases per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 8.9 which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.2 while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 48 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (7.5), Mississippi has a value of 8.9 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (8.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.3).
Prior Value
(9.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
46.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 46.5 which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 36.1 while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.5.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 48 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (36.5), Mississippi has a value of 46.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(36.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (46.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (48.3).
Prior Value
(48.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
69.9
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 69.9 which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 56.1 while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 61.2.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 48 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (54.0), Mississippi has a value of 69.9 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(54.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (69.9) is less and better than the previously measured value (72.8).
Prior Value
(72.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Mammography Screening: Medicare Population

Current Value:
44.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 44.0% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than 46.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than 44.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (47.0%), Mississippi has a value of 44.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (44.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (43.0%).
Prior Value
(43.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Oral Cavity and Pharynx Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
13.1
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 13.1 which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.3 while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.9.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 48 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (11.9), Mississippi has a value of 13.1 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (13.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.9).
Prior Value
(12.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate

131.4
Cases per 100,000 males
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 131.4 which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 114.1 while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 123.0.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 48 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (110.5), Mississippi has a value of 131.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(110.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (131.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (135.6).
Prior Value
(135.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes

Current Value:
42.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (42.1) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (41.0).
Prior Value
(41.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Diabetes: Medicare Population

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Diabetes: Medicare Population

28.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 28.0% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (24.0%), Mississippi has a value of 28.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (28.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (28.0%).
Prior Value
(28.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi

Health / Disabilities

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi

Health / Disabilities

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi Adults with an Independent Living Difficulty

Current Value:
7.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Mississippi has a value of 7.9%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (7.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.1%).
Prior Value
(8.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Adults with Disability Living in Poverty

Current Value:
30.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 30.1% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.8% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.2%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Mississippi has a value of 30.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Children with a Disability

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Children with a Disability

5.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (4.5%), Mississippi has a value of 5.6%.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty

Current Value:
7.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (5.3%), Mississippi has a value of 7.0%.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Persons with a Disability

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Persons with a Disability

17.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Mississippi has a value of 17.2%.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Persons with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:
4.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (3.6%), Mississippi has a value of 4.2%.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:
3.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (2.6%), Mississippi has a value of 3.4%.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Persons with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:
4.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Mississippi has a value of 4.1%.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty

Current Value:
9.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (6.7%), Mississippi has a value of 9.9%.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi

Health / Family Planning

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi

Health / Family Planning

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi Teen Birth Rate: 15-19

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Teen Birth Rate: 15-19

25.6
Live births per 1,000 females aged 15-19
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (13.9), Mississippi has a value of 25.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (25.6) is less and better than the previously measured value (27.9).
Prior Value
(27.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Teen Pregnancy Rate

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Teen Pregnancy Rate

30.8
Pregnancies per 1,000 females aged 15-19
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (30.8) is less and better than the previously measured value (32.5).
Prior Value
(32.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (31.4), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(31.4)

State: Mississippi

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi Adults 65+ with Medicare Insurance

Current Value:
97.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (95.6%), Mississippi has a value of 97.8%.
US Value
(95.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Adults with Health Insurance

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Adults with Health Insurance

83.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 83.6% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.6% while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.6%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (88.7%), Mississippi has a value of 83.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(88.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (83.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (82.3%).
Prior Value
(82.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Children with Health Insurance

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Children with Health Insurance

94.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 94.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than 95.5% while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than 94.2%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (94.9%), Mississippi has a value of 94.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(94.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (94.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (93.8%).
Prior Value
(93.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Medicare Healthcare Costs

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Medicare Healthcare Costs

$10,949
Dollars per enrollee
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value ($9,729), Mississippi has a value of $10,949.
US Value
($9,729)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi ($10,949) is greater  than the previously measured value ($10,540).
Prior Value
($10,540)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Non-Physician Primary Care Provider Rate

Current Value:
154
Providers per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 154 which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than 140 while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than 125.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (154) is greater and better than the previously measured value (146).
Prior Value
(146)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi People with Medicaid Health Insurance

Current Value:
23.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (20.4%), Mississippi has a value of 23.6%.
US Value
(20.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Persons with Health Insurance

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Persons with Health Insurance

85.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 85.7% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than 88.1%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (85.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (86.1%).
Prior Value
(86.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (92.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

State: Mississippi Persons with Private Health Insurance Only

Current Value:
49.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (54.8%), Mississippi has a value of 49.0%.
US Value
(54.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (49.0%) is greater  than the previously measured value (47.9%).
Prior Value
(47.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Persons with Public Health Insurance Only

Current Value:
27.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (24.8%), Mississippi has a value of 27.6%.
US Value
(24.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (27.6%) is less  than the previously measured value (28.4%).
Prior Value
(28.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population

Current Value:
3,349.0
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 3,349.0 which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,617.0 while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,014.0.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (2,677.0), Mississippi has a value of 3,349.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(2,677.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (3,349.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (3,423.0).
Prior Value
(3,423.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Primary Care Provider Rate

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Primary Care Provider Rate

53
Providers per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 53 which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than 76 while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than 68.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (53) is less and worse than the previously measured value (54).
Prior Value
(54)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi

Health / Health Information Technology

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi

Health / Health Information Technology

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi Households with an Internet Subscription

Current Value:
80.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 80.2% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.3% while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.7%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (88.5%), Mississippi has a value of 80.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices

Current Value:
90.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 90.0% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than 93.5% while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than 92.7%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (94.0%), Mississippi has a value of 90.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(94.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Persons with an Internet Subscription

Current Value:
83.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 83.9% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.8% while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than 89.6%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (91.0%), Mississippi has a value of 83.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke)

57.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (38.8), Mississippi has a value of 57.8 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(38.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (57.8) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (54.5).
Prior Value
(54.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (33.4), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(33.4)

State: Mississippi Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease

Current Value:
125.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (91.8), Mississippi has a value of 125.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(91.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (125.6) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (119.9).
Prior Value
(119.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (71.1), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(71.1)

State: Mississippi Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Attack

Current Value:
142.0
Deaths per 100,000 population 35+ years
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (142.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (135.8).
Prior Value
(135.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population

Current Value:
14.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 14.0% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (14.0%), Mississippi has a value of 14.0%.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (14.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (13.0%).
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Heart Failure: Medicare Population

Current Value:
11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Mississippi has a value of 11.0%.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (11.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.0%).
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population

Current Value:
65.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 65.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 64.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 67.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Mississippi has a value of 65.0%.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (65.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (64.0%).
Prior Value
(64.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Hypertension: Medicare Population

Current Value:
74.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 74.0% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 66.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 69.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Mississippi has a value of 74.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (74.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (73.0%).
Prior Value
(73.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population

Current Value:
24.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 24.0% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (21.0%), Mississippi has a value of 24.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (24.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (24.0%).
Prior Value
(24.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Stroke: Medicare Population

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Stroke: Medicare Population

6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 6.0% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Mississippi has a value of 6.0%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (6.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Influenza and Pneumonia

Current Value:
20.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (13.0), Mississippi has a value of 20.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.0 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (20.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (25.1).
Prior Value
(25.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi COVID-19 Daily Average Case-Fatality Rate

Current Value:
1.6
Deaths per 100 cases
(Mar 3, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 1.6 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.3 while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.9.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 49 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (1.7), Mississippi has a value of 1.6 which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (1.6) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (1.1).
Prior Value
(1.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi COVID-19 Daily Average Incidence Rate

Current Value:
10.02
Cases per 100,000 population
(Mar 3, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 10.02 which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.02 while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.68.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (10.97), Mississippi has a value of 10.02 which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.97)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (10.02) is less and better than the previously measured value (11.66).
Prior Value
(11.66)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population

Current Value:
44.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 44.0% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than 49.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than 46.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (50.0%), Mississippi has a value of 44.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (44.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (42.0%).
Prior Value
(42.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population

Current Value:
7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 7.0% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than 7.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than 7.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (8.0%), Mississippi has a value of 7.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (7.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (5.0%).
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi Babies with Low Birthweight

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Babies with Low Birthweight

12.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (8.5%), Mississippi has a value of 12.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (12.4%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (11.9%).
Prior Value
(11.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Babies with Very Low Birthweight

Current Value:
2.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (1.4%), Mississippi has a value of 2.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (2.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.1%).
Prior Value
(2.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Infant Mortality Rate

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Infant Mortality Rate

8.7
Deaths per 1,000 live births
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (5.4), Mississippi has a value of 8.7 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(5.4 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (8.7) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (8.6).
Prior Value
(8.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.0), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.0)
<div>MICH-02: Reduce the rate of infant deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

State: Mississippi Mothers who Breastfeed

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Mothers who Breastfeed

51.1%
(2011)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (51.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (56.4%).
Prior Value
(56.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Mothers who Received Early Prenatal Care

Current Value:
75.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (78.3%), Mississippi has a value of 75.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (75.6%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (75.2%).
Prior Value
(75.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Mothers who Smoked During Pregnancy

Current Value:
6.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (4.6%), Mississippi has a value of 6.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(4.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (6.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (7.8%).
Prior Value
(7.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (4.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(4.3%)

State: Mississippi Preterm Births

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Preterm Births

14.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (14.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (14.2%).
Prior Value
(14.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (9.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(9.4%)

State: Mississippi

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide

Current Value:
16.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (13.5), Mississippi has a value of 16.2 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.5 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (16.2) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (13.9).
Prior Value
(13.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (12.8), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(12.8)
<div>MHMD-01: Reduce the suicide rate <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

State: Mississippi Depression: Medicare Population

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Depression: Medicare Population

16.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 16.0% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (16.0%), Mississippi has a value of 16.0%.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (16.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.0%).
Prior Value
(16.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Frequent Mental Distress

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Frequent Mental Distress

17.6%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 17.6% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.1% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.5%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 49 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (14.0%), Mississippi has a value of 17.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (17.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.7%).
Prior Value
(15.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Mississippi Mental Health Provider Rate

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Mental Health Provider Rate

216
Providers per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 216 which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than 315 while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than 227.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (216) is greater and better than the previously measured value (199).
Prior Value
(199)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Poor Mental Health: Average Number of Days

Current Value:
4.7
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 4.7 which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.8 while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 5.3.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (4.8), Mississippi has a value of 4.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(4.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (4.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.4).
Prior Value
(4.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Youth who had a Major Depressive Episode

Current Value:
13.9%
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (13.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.8%).
Prior Value
(11.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi

Health / Mortality Data

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi

Health / Mortality Data

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi Premature Death

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Premature Death

12,697.5
Years per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 12,697.5 which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 8,079.1 while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9,394.3.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (7,971.5), Mississippi has a value of 12,697.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7,971.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

State: Mississippi

Health / Older Adults

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi

Health / Older Adults

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi Adults 65+ with a Disability

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Adults 65+ with a Disability

40.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), Mississippi has a value of 40.7%.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:
15.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Mississippi has a value of 15.2%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:
9.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (7.4%), Mississippi has a value of 9.2%.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:
8.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Mississippi has a value of 8.9%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty

Current Value:
16.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (13.6%), Mississippi has a value of 16.7%.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Alzheimer's Disease

Current Value:
52.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (32.4), Mississippi has a value of 52.9 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(32.4 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (52.9) is less and better than the previously measured value (58.0).
Prior Value
(58.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population

Current Value:
6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Mississippi has a value of 6.0%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (6.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi

Health / Oral Health

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi

Health / Oral Health

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi Dentist Rate

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Dentist Rate

52
Dentists per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 52 which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than 70 while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than 63.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (52) is greater and better than the previously measured value (50).
Prior Value
(50)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi

Health / Other Conditions

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi

Health / Other Conditions

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population

Current Value:
15.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 15.0% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (18.0%), Mississippi has a value of 15.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (15.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.0%).
Prior Value
(15.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Osteoporosis: Medicare Population

Current Value:
10.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 10.0% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Mississippi has a value of 10.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (10.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (9.0%).
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population

39.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 39.0% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 37.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (35.0%), Mississippi has a value of 39.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (39.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (38.0%).
Prior Value
(38.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi

Health / Prevention & Safety

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi

Health / Prevention & Safety

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Falls

Current Value:
10.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (10.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (10.2).
Prior Value
(10.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Firearms

Current Value:
23.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 23.8 which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.8 while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.9.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (12.0), Mississippi has a value of 23.8 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (23.8) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (21.4).
Prior Value
(21.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.7), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.7)

State: Mississippi Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries

Current Value:
81.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (57.6), Mississippi has a value of 81.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(57.6 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (81.6) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (73.1).
Prior Value
(73.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (43.2), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(43.2)

State: Mississippi

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Asthma

Current Value:
1.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (1.5) is less and better than the previously measured value (1.8).
Prior Value
(1.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Chronic Lower Respiratory Diseases

59.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (36.4), Mississippi has a value of 59.2 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(36.4 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (59.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (59.2).
Prior Value
(59.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Asthma: Medicare Population

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Asthma: Medicare Population

5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Mississippi has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (5.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.0%).
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi COPD: Medicare Population

Current Value:

State: Mississippi COPD: Medicare Population

12.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 12.0% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Mississippi has a value of 12.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (12.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.0%).
Prior Value
(12.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi

Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi

Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi Chlamydia Incidence Rate

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Chlamydia Incidence Rate

850.2
Cases per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (551.0), Mississippi has a value of 850.2 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(551.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (850.2) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (739.5).
Prior Value
(739.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Gonorrhea Incidence Rate

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Gonorrhea Incidence Rate

405.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (187.8), Mississippi has a value of 405.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(187.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (405.5) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (326.4).
Prior Value
(326.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi HIV Incidence Rate

Current Value:

State: Mississippi HIV Incidence Rate

16.1
Cases per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (16.1) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (16.0).
Prior Value
(16.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Syphilis Incidence Rate

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Syphilis Incidence Rate

23.2
Cases per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (11.9), Mississippi has a value of 23.2 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (23.2) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (16.5).
Prior Value
(16.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi

Health / Tobacco Use

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi

Health / Tobacco Use

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi Teens who Smoke

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Teens who Smoke

3.3%
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (3.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.5%).
Prior Value
(4.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi Frequent Physical Distress

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Frequent Physical Distress

12.9%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 12.9% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.8% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.9%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 49 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Mississippi has a value of 12.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (12.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.5%).
Prior Value
(14.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Mississippi Insufficient Sleep

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Insufficient Sleep

35.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 35.3% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 33.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.3%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), Mississippi has a value of 35.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (35.3%) is less and better than the previously measured value (37.8%).
Prior Value
(37.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (26.7%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(26.7%)

State: Mississippi Poor Physical Health: Average Number of Days

Current Value:
3.7
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 3.7 which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.3 while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.6.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (3.3), Mississippi has a value of 3.7 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.3)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (3.7) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (2.9).
Prior Value
(2.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Homicide

Current Value:
16.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 16.4 which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.2 while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.6.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (6.6), Mississippi has a value of 16.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (16.4) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (13.8).
Prior Value
(13.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.5), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.5)
<div>IVP-09: Reduce homicides <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

State: Mississippi Violent Crime Rate

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Violent Crime Rate

279.5
Crimes per 100,000 population
(2014-2016)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (386.5), Mississippi has a value of 279.5 which is lower and better.
US Value
(386.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (279.5) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (271.3).
Prior Value
(271.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi

Community / Demographics

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi

Community / Demographics

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi Average Household Size

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Average Household Size

2.60
Persons per household
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (2.60), Mississippi has a value of 2.60.
US Value
(2.60)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Foreign Born Persons

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Foreign Born Persons

2.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Mississippi has a value of 2.3%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Households

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Households

1,121,269
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Population Over Age 65 (Count)

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Population Over Age 65 (Count)

487,750
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Veteran Population

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Veteran Population

6.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (6.6%), Mississippi has a value of 6.9%.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi

Community / Public Safety

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi

Community / Public Safety

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Motor Vehicle Collisions

29.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (29.3) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (28.6).
Prior Value
(28.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths

18.6%
Percent of driving deaths with alcohol involvement
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 18.6% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 27.9% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.3%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (26.3%), Mississippi has a value of 18.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (18.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (18.5%).
Prior Value
(18.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi

Community / Social Environment

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi

Community / Social Environment

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi Child Abuse Rate (per 10,000)

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Child Abuse Rate (per 10,000)

47.7
Cases per 10,000 children
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (47.7) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (43.8).
Prior Value
(43.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Mississippi Children in Single-Parent Female Households

Current Value:
31.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 31.9% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.5% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.8%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (20.2%), Mississippi has a value of 31.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(20.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Children in Single-Parent Households

Current Value:
36.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 36.3% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.1% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.1%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Mississippi has a value of 36.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Linguistic Isolation

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Linguistic Isolation

0.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 0.8% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.1% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.8%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (4.2%), Mississippi has a value of 0.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(4.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi People 65+ Living Alone

Current Value:

State: Mississippi People 65+ Living Alone

27.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 27.8% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.6%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (26.4%), Mississippi has a value of 27.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi People 65+ Living Alone (Count)

Current Value:

State: Mississippi People 65+ Living Alone (Count)

135,473
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi People who have Difficulty Speaking English

Current Value:
1.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 1.6% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.5% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (8.2%), Mississippi has a value of 1.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Population that Moved from a Different County in the Same State

3.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (3.2%), Mississippi has a value of 3.1%.
US Value
(3.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (3.1%) is greater  than the previously measured value (2.9%).
Prior Value
(2.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Population that Moved from a Different State

Current Value:
2.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (2.5%), Mississippi has a value of 2.4%.
US Value
(2.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (2.4%) is greater  than the previously measured value (2.0%).
Prior Value
(2.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Population that Moved from Abroad

Current Value:
0.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (0.6%), Mississippi has a value of 0.5%.
US Value
(0.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (0.5%) is greater  than the previously measured value (0.3%).
Prior Value
(0.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Population that Moved Within the Same County

Current Value:
5.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (6.2%), Mississippi has a value of 5.1%.
US Value
(6.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (5.1%) is less  than the previously measured value (5.4%).
Prior Value
(5.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Social Associations

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Social Associations

12.5
Membership associations per 10,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 12.5 which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than 10.7 while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than 8.6.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (9.1), Mississippi has a value of 12.5 which is higher and better.
US Value
(9.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (12.5) is greater and better than the previously measured value (12.4).
Prior Value
(12.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi

Community / Transportation

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi

Community / Transportation

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi Households without a Vehicle

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Households without a Vehicle

6.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 6.1% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.2% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (8.3%), Mississippi has a value of 6.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Mean Travel Time to Work

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Mean Travel Time to Work

25.4
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 25.4 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.3 while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.7.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Mississippi has a value of 25.4 which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Solo Drivers with a Long Commute

Current Value:
33.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 33.7% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.1% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.6%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (36.4%), Mississippi has a value of 33.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(36.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (33.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (33.4%).
Prior Value
(33.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Workers Commuting by Public Transportation

Current Value:
0.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 0.3% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than 1.1% while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.6%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), Mississippi has a value of 0.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.3%)

State: Mississippi Workers who Drive Alone to Work

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Workers who Drive Alone to Work

83.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 83.6% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 75.2% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 78.3%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (71.7%), Mississippi has a value of 83.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(71.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi

Economy / Employment

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi

Economy / Employment

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi Employer Establishments

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Employer Establishments

58,897
Number of Establishments
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (58,897) is less  than the previously measured value (59,130).
Prior Value
(59,130)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Mississippi Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:
53.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 53.6% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.8% while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than 57.1%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (58.5%), Mississippi has a value of 53.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(58.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:
53.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 53.0% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than 59.9% while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than 57.7%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (59.6%), Mississippi has a value of 53.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Size of Labor Force

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Size of Labor Force

1,218,125
Persons
(January 2024)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (1,218,125) is less and worse than the previously measured value (1,224,235).
Prior Value
(1,224,235)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Total Employment

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Total Employment

930,852
Paid Employees
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (930,852) is less  than the previously measured value (949,927).
Prior Value
(949,927)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Total Employment Change

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Total Employment Change

-2.0%
(2020-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of -2.0% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than -3.7% while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than -5.8%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (-4.3%), Mississippi has a value of -2.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(-4.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (-2.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (-0.9%).
Prior Value
(-0.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Unemployed Workers in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:
3.4%
(January 2024)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 3.4% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.8% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.3%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on non-seasonally-adjusted data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (4.1%), Mississippi has a value of 3.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (3.4%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (2.6%).
Prior Value
(2.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi

Economy / Food Insecurity

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi

Economy / Food Insecurity

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi Child Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Child Food Insecurity Rate

18.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 18.8% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.8% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (12.8%), Mississippi has a value of 18.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (18.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (20.4%).
Prior Value
(20.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Food Insecure Children Likely Ineligible for Assistance

27%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 27% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 28% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (25%), Mississippi has a value of 27% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(25%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (27%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (20%).
Prior Value
(20%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Food Insecurity Rate

16.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 16.3% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.7%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (10.4%), Mississippi has a value of 16.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (16.3%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (16.2%).
Prior Value
(16.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Households Receiving SNAP with Children

Current Value:
51.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (47.9%), Mississippi has a value of 51.5%.
US Value
(47.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count)

Current Value:
79,576
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Projected Child Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:
22.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 22.2% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.6% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.7%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.

State: Mississippi Projected Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Projected Food Insecurity Rate

18.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 18.7% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.7% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.2%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.

State: Mississippi Students Eligible for the Free Lunch Program

Current Value:
73.7%
(2022-2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 73.7% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.8% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 53.9%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 43 U.S. states.
Compared to the US Value (42.8%), Mississippi has a value of 73.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(42.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (73.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (99.6%).
Prior Value
(99.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi

Economy / Government Assistance

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi

Economy / Government Assistance

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi Households with Cash Public Assistance Income

Current Value:
2.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 2.1% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.5% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.3%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (2.7%), Mississippi has a value of 2.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Households with Supplemental Security Income

Current Value:
7.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 7.7% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.7% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 5.7%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (5.1%), Mississippi has a value of 7.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(5.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi

Economy / Housing & Homes

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi

Economy / Housing & Homes

Value
Compared to:

State: Mississippi Homeowner Vacancy Rate

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Homeowner Vacancy Rate

1.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 1.3% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.1% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.3%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (1.1%), Mississippi has a value of 1.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Homeownership

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Homeownership

58.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Mississippi has a value of 58.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than 59.2% while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than 57.1%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (57.8%), Mississippi has a value of 58.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(57.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Housing Units

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Housing Units

1,342,831
Housing units
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Mississippi (1,342,831) is greater  than the previously measured value (1,331,993).
Prior Value
(1,331,993)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Mississippi Median Household Gross Rent

Current Value:

State: Mississippi Median Household Gross Rent

$896
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value ($1,268), Mississippi has a value of $896 which is lower and better.
US Value
($1,268)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mississippi value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Gulf Coast Community Exchange